Winning the Hardware Software Game Winning the Hardware-Software Game - 2nd Edition

Using Game Theory to Optimize the Pace of New Technology Adoption
  • How do you encourage speedier adoption of your product or service?
  • How do you increase the value your product or service creates for your customers?
  • How do you extract more of the value created by your product or service for yourself?

Read more...

Latest Comments

  • Anonymous said More
    This was excellent and extremely... Tuesday, 21 April 2020
  • Anonymous said More
    Well written. Well constructed. Tuesday, 13 August 2019
  • Ron Giuntini said More
    As always a good read.
    I have always... Thursday, 25 January 2018

This is a new idea I'm working on. I'd love to hear any feedback you might have.

 

We Collect and Analyze Data

Why do we collect and analyze data? It informs us about (i) what happened in a given time and place and (ii) why (see Figure 1).

 

fig1

We use that information to help us:

(i) Predict what will happen in the future (see Figure 2), and

fig2

(ii) Shape what happens in the future (see Figure 3).

fig3

 

Data-Generating System

fig4

 

We use data from past events to predict and shape what happens in the future. Our predictions will only be valid if we correctly and accurately interpret the data we use as the basis for our predictions. To interpret the data correctly, and thus use it to make valid predictions, we must understand the data-generating system from which our data were collected. We must understand first, the motivations of the actors and the context in which the actions took place. These are shaped by both intrinsic factors (Customer/Actor) and extrinsic factors (Context/Environment, Content Provider). To make accurate predictions, we must also understand the context in which the data were collected (Context/Environment, Customer/Actor, Data Collector).

The data-generating system thus comprises four sets of influencers (see Figure 5): Content Provider, Customer/Actor, Data Collector, and Context/Environment.

fig5

  1. Content Provider: Provides content to Customers. Content Provider shapes the environment through his (a) selection of content provided to Customers, and (b) choice architecture used for presentation of content to Customers.
  2. Customer/Actor: Takes actions motivated by Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, in both tangible and intangible form.
  3. Data Collector: Collects the information Analysts use about what happened. Data Collector shapes the information collected through his (a) choice of Customers from which to collect information, (b) design of data collection instruments through which Customers provide data, and (c) collation of data collected from Customers.
  4. External Environment: Background information that shapes actions, including, for example, culture, law, access to alternatives, degree of anonymity, and the state of the economy. The External Environment (a) shapes and primes Customers actions, (b) affects the information Customers provide, and/or (c) determines the generalizability of the information provided by and/or collected from Customers.
  5. Data Scientist/Analyst: Analyzes data collected by Data Collectors.

The data-generating system is a complex adaptive system. It changes and adapts to the evolving environment.

The Future Is Increasingly Difficult to Predict

When extrinsic factors (acts of nature, choice architecture, available alternatives) influence what happens (nature’s actions, human actions), analysts must understand (capture and measure) those extrinsic factors. Furthermore, to be able to shape outcomes, you must generally be able to control those extrinsic factors.

Our environments are becoming increasingly complex. At the same time, extrinsic factors are playing a larger role in shaping outcomes. This larger impact of extrinsic factors on peoples’ actions makes it difficult to use past information to predict, not to mention shape, future outcomes. This is true for two reasons. First, it’s difficult to capture the full environment – all the influencers – in which past actions took place. As a result, it is difficult to figure out precisely why events turned out the way they did. And second, future environments are unpredictable. Unpredictable environments that play a large role in creating outcomes makes it difficult to predict – not to mention shape – what those outcomes will be.

More Blogs

Cannabis Industry Rollouts: Lessons Learned from States’ Experiences

27-04-2020 - Hits:407 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Bart Schaneman from MJ Business Daily recently released, “2020 Cultivation Snapshot: U.S. Wholesale Marijuana Prices & Supply.” The information contained in the report helped cement certain insights I’ve had about the evolution of the cannabis market. Background info In addition to the myriad other laws and regulations, all states essentially have two...

Read more

A Data-Generating System: A Framework for Data Assessment

14-04-2020 - Hits:342 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Suppose I gave you, the Data Analyst, a dataset of information on sales of Ford automobiles, and suppose I told you to use that dataset to predict total national sales of Ford automobiles for next 12 months. What would you want to know about the data you were given? If you...

Read more

Hemp and CBD Market Supply

06-04-2020 - Hits:314 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

The information in this post was compiled in an attempt to understand 2 issues: Does the cultivation of hemp differ depending on the hemp product supplied (fiber, seed, or flower)? Is the CBD produced from hemp (cannabis with ≤ 0.3% THC) identical to the CBD produced from marijuana (cannabis with > 0.3%...

Read more

Trends in Cannabis Patents Over Time

08-12-2019 - Hits:1400 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Patent Counts by Year I searched the USPTO patent database for all patents for which the patent abstract contained any of the following terms: cannabis, cannabinoid, marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinoid, or cannabinol. My search yielded 914 patents. As seen in Figure 1, there were only a handful of cannabis patents each year until the...

Read more

Why Is Alcohol Accepted While Cannabis Is Not?

24-11-2019 - Hits:1673 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Alcohol Use In America Cannabis Use In America Prevalence and Social Attitudes What Determines an Activity’s Prevalence? Social Attitudes and Laws Social Acceptance: Alcohol vs. Cannabis Social Narratives vs. Reality The Role of Common Knowledge   Both alcohol and cannabis have been around for thousands of years, and both have been used for recreational, spiritual, and medical purposes. Both...

Read more

Social Development Requires More Than Just New Technology

14-10-2019 - Hits:887 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

This post continues the discussion about what society needs in addition to technology to develop. In my previous entry, The Growth and Development Paradox, I established that Technology enables societies to develop. Foundational technologies have existed for thousands of years. Yet, sustainable development didn’t occur until the Industrial Revolution. Technological development is thus not...

Read more

Cannabis Science and Technology Finally Got Hitched!

03-10-2019 - Hits:756 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

The Separate Worlds of Science and Technology Throughout most of human history, science and technology existed within completely separate realms of society. Science, or natural philosophy, fell within the realm of the upper ranks of society. Natural philosophers were “uncommitted to any program of useful knowledge,” developing “abstract speculations about the...

Read more

The Growth and Development Paradox

24-09-2019 - Hits:832 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Wheat yields in the UK hovered around ½ tonne per hectare for hundreds of years (see Figure 1). Imagine being able to generate no more wheat per unit of land than your ancestors who had lived 100 generations before you had been able to grow! The introduction of crop rotation...

Read more